Collapse of Evolution

It’s reign of tyranny is finally at an end. For a century and a half it has reigned supreme in the kingdom of science. Its’ foundation was made of styrofoam and rested on whipped cream. It looked and sounded great while it lasted, but the collapse of evolution was preordained because it was really a fairy tale made up by haters of truth and deniers of logic and truth.

Evidence supporting evolution

The evidence which supported evolution was at best superficial. At its’ worst it is lacking in logic and reasonable conclusions of evidence. The people who built the “kingdom of evolution” were people who wanted to escape the constraints of a society built on principles derived from a Biblical world view. To achieve that goal it was necessary to present a scenario of how the universe came into being without the need of a Creator. In other words, the storytellers of evolution were anti-theists. The term I used is not atheist, but anti-theists. An atheist would need to be all-knowing to be able to determine with certainty that there is no God. Any rational person can understand that there is no one on this earth that knows all information. Thus, there can be no true atheist.

On the other hand, an anti-theist is someone who is against(anti) God. They know there is a Creator but they are filled with hate toward their Creator. Rather than yielding to logic and knowledge, they rebel and built a kingdom of rebellion against the true Creator of all things.

A picture of nothing
Nothing

The evidence supporting evolution has never been based on good science but has always been built on just so stories of how things came to be and how they evolved to become different and more complex. How do we know they are stories? One reason we know they are stories is because the “facts” (I use the term loosely) of evolution keep changing. If something is true, it does not continually change. Evolutionists will never admit that they were wrong but will admit only that they are surprised when the truth of a certain evolution story is contrary to their original story. When a hypothesis does not prove true, they merely say that it will take more studies and money to discover why.

The evidence supporting evolution is at best tenuous. But to be truthful, it is just a story based on a lie. Is there any wonder that the collapse of evolution is inevitable?

What about scientific evidence for evolution

Picture of science experiment
What does science say?

Yes! What about it? There is not one shred of scientific evidence that will support evolution as taught in schools today.

They will use a false definition by defining evolution as change. It is easy to see that change occurs everywhere and in everything. So, they preach that evolution must be true.

But, that is not the true definition of what they call evolution. What they define as Darwinian evolution begins with the simple and progresses to the complex. They will overlook laws of nature in the beginning and along the whole process to bring about their wanted conclusion. To be Darwinian evolution each succeeding generation must become more complex. This must continue for millions of generations and billions of years. If that really happened then evolutionists might have a case to argue in the court of science.

However, science has disproved any such process occurring in living things. Instead of information and complexity increasing from one generation to the next, the opposite is occurring. As more and more information is gained about the process science is finding that all life is actually de-evolving(decreasing in information and complexity) instead of evolving.

Evolution is blind irrational faith

Blind man
Blind faith

Evolutionists enjoy making fun of people who believe in a God Who created the universe and all that is in it. But, being realistic and using a reasoning mind, it is easy to see that it is the evolutionist who is the one that is irrational in his or her belief. As science continues to prove the case against evolution, those who believe in evolution will have to travel further and further from the realm of rationality. As we learn more about the science of living things we see that they are the ones who accept the “belief” of evolution without any real evidence to back up their faith in it. That is what should be called a religion. But it is a weak religion because its’ “beliefs” are not built on viable evidence.

Irrational foundations

Desert Sand
Shifting Foundations

Let me list just a few of the “foundations” which evolutionists are building their house on.

  • The Big Bang. There is no scientific evidence to confirm without a doubt that such an event ever occurred.
  • Expansion. Once again no scientific evidence to support such a claim. They must have it there or The Big Bang cannot be possible.
  • Dark Matter. This is a substance that has never been observed or detected. Yet, they claim that it makes up 96% of the matter of the universe.
  • Dark energy. Once again this has never been detected or observed, but it makes up 75% of the energy of the universe.
  • Life spontaneously generates. This has never been observed and directly violates the Law of Biogenesis.

More evidence

Evolutionists were confident that the fossil record would validate their hypothesis of the increase of complexity in living things. They have drawn charts to support their theory, but the evidence of the fossils in the layers do not bear out what they were expecting. Instead of proceeding in complexity from lower layers to higher layers, it is a mixture of simple with complex and often in the reverse of what evolutionists predicted. The Cambrian explosion blows the concept of evolution out of the water because of the sudden appearance of complex creatures along with some of “simpler” forms.

The truth of the matter

It is one thing to make a mistake and not come to the right conclusion. But, it is a totally different matter when the facts say one thing and the scientist reports something else. All evidences point to a recent creation of less than 10,000 years ago. When a theory must constantly be revised and even rewritten so it can be maintained, then we are no longer dealing with science.

The people who “push” evolution are not scientists. They are snake oil salesmen and they will lie and present falsehoods or do anything just so their “theory” can still be maintained. They are not seekers of truth, but are wolves in sheep’s clothing seeking to rule over anyone that they can delude with their lies. The facts prove that evolution is a lie. It is devoid of sound scientific evidence.

The bigger picture

Picture of earth from space
World View

Evolutionists are merely a part of a bigger picture which is seeking to manipulate and rule over as many people as possible. It is run by what is called “the god of this world”. The Bible calls him a “liar and the father of all lies”. So, when you here a scientist or a documentary that talks of millions of years and billions of years, stop and think. These people have believed a lie and are trying to get you to fall for the same lie. Use the brain that your Creator gave you and do a little research. If you are willing to be logical and balanced in your research you will find that those who preach evolution have no real truth to base their beliefs on. Because of that, they have no foundation for what they believe.

Is there evidence for evolution? You decide.

God bless you as you search!

 

 

 

 

Science Fact vs Science Fiction-Why Do Scientists Lie

Among the most influential people in today’s society are those who call themselves scientists. It does not matter what field you are in you can gain prestige just by adding “scientist” or a “PhD” in the description of what you do. But because so many have taken advantage of this there has been introduced a voluminous amount of material into the knowledge base in the area of science. Because so many have entered the field with an agenda to push rather than a search for truth we have the problem of science fact vs science fiction.

Science fact vs science fiction

As agendas have been introduced more and more into science research it is becoming harder and harder to distinguish science fact vs science fiction. Over the past 60 years many science fiction genre have been produced which have really increased the interest of the general public in science. We have seen this in science fiction novels, movies, television series, super and mutated characters and gaming devices.

Much of the science used in these productions is well-founded. But just as prevalent is science which has no grounding in empirical evidence what so ever. Someone once pointed out that in the 1960s series of Star Trek how all the doors opened automatically when someone approached. That was founded on radio and infrared studies that pointed to such possibilities. We are very accustomed today for doors in many commercial establishments to automatically open when we approach.

But in that same series they introduced warp drive. This was supposedly accomplished by “warping” space so that the distance between objects were decreased by bending space and time. According to the theory of relativity gravity warps space. But the degree of warp is not great enough to facilitate a noticeable decrease in the overall distance between two objects. To develop that amount of gravity would ,according to “black hole” theory, suck everything into the black hole that is created and nothing could ever escape.

So we see sound science and fictional science portrayed as equal. After a half century of such things as this, it is hard for the “layman” to tell what is science fact and what is science fiction.

Why do scientists lie

The question may be better stated as “Do scientists lie?” We have had almost two full generations of students who have been force-fed whatever science told them to believe. Those in charge of the education system in America had a predisposed agenda. That agenda was one based on humanistic materialism. That particular world view does not allow for anything other than naturalistic causes in nature.

By setting this standard, they did not outright lie, they just pointed the direction which science had to move. If any view espoused anything other than a naturalistic process for the beginning of the universe or the beginning of life on earth, it was automatically dismissed as unscientific.

Where the lie comes in is that fail to tell you that this particular stance is unscientific. For generations we have believed what the scientists have told us. And the very premises that they promote is not scientific.

Many of today’s scientists have grown up being told the lie of only naturalistic causes can be scientific. To these students, that is the truth, because that is all that they know. They have not been told the real truth. They have been told the “truth” that fit the agenda of the humanist. They teach a lie as truth because that is all that they know.

Science searching for truth

True science is the search for truth. In the search for truth in any area, real science will consider and weigh the facts from every view point. Experiments will be performed and hypothesis will be confirmed or falsified. Hypothesis will not be denied simply because they do not fit the given agenda. Questions will be gladly entertained and put to the test to see if the hypothesis is viable or not. Proposals are not thrown out just because they contradict the agenda. Search for real truth entertains questions.

The science agenda that we have been fed the past half century does not allow for questions. It discounts scientific experiments which contradict their premises that all things must be naturally caused or explained. True science searches for real truths. If it does not allow for questions, then it is not real science.

Science fact science fiction

Real science is based in fact. Science fiction is based in imagination. The two are not necessarily opposed to one another. However, one must not confuse one for the other.

Let’s consider a few examples.

  • Naturalistic science says that this universe came from nothing.(Of course they had to amend that by saying it came from a singularity). Real science abides by first law of thermodynamics which says that matter/energy can not be created, increased or decreased by natural causes. That the universe came from nothing is fiction. The law is science.
  • Law of cause and effect says that the cause is always greater than the effect. How can nothing be greater than something? That nothing is more powerful than all the power in the universe is fiction. The law is science.
  • Naturalistic science speaks of “dark matter”, “dark energy” and “black holes”. These are constructs made up to fill in the holes which the “Big Bang” science can not explain. There is no proof of “dark matter”, “dark energy”, or even “black holes”. Real science is empirical and testable. It does not need to make up imagined constructs to make it viable.
  • Naturalistic science claims that life originated from lifeless molecules and evolved to humans. Real science abides by the proven law of abiogenesis, life comes from life.
  • Naturalistic science says that mutations cause life forms to grow in complexity. Real science abides by the scientific findings which prove that mutations cause a decrease in complexity and information in the species, thereby trending toward extinction.
  • Naturalistic science allows for results which back their agenda. Real science follows the facts and the results that they prove.

Conclusion

Let me state here, that I am not against science fiction. But I am against fiction that is promoted as science. We have too many so-called scientists today who are not scientists, though they have attained degrees in what are called scientific fields, but they have sold out to fame and money and prestige instead of searching for the truth in what ever field they are in.

It is time for the common man to begin to ask questions about everything. We must inform ourselves and be skeptical, even of our own beliefs. If a belief we have cannot stand up to logic and reason, then we might need to reconsider our stance. Real truth does not mind questions. If it is truth, it will stand any test put to it.

Science fact-science fiction
Celebrity Scientist

Many of the “scientific truths” that have been hoisted upon the populace are not truths at all. They are imaginations and illusions which people with a hidden agenda have forced upon us proclaiming them to be truths when in reality they are fictions. Listen to your news and documentaries critically. When they make statements about evolution or dark matter or dark energy or even climate change, just say out loud, (if only to yourself), “Give me some facts to back up your proofs. Is there any proofs that contradict your proofs?”

Not all science is fiction. But there is so much that is fiction that as you learn the truth you will be amazed at how much you have been lied to by people who have called themselves scientists.

My hope

Science fact
Truth will win

My hope is that this will not turn you off of real science, but will rather turn you on to real science and alert you to the science fiction that has been promoted as real science.

I encourage you to read on both sides of the question when presented by scientific findings. When you hear about the “Big Bang” from celebrated scientists, go and search for opposing views. You can find plenty on the internet.

When you hear National Geographic Channel speak of evolution, go and find a site that espouses creation rather than evolution. Compare and see which best fits.

When you hear your professor blithely state that so-and-so evolved, with respect kindly ask if he could delineate how it evolved and from what it evolved.

Remember, real science invites questions. Any science that can not be questioned is probably not real science.

 

To read more you can click HERE HEREHERE,  and HERE.

 

 

Earth’s Magnetic Field-Does It Disprove Evolution

Just recently several studies have been released that show that the Earth’s magnetic field, the Van Allen Belt, is decreasing and has been so for longer than studies have been carried on. Since the 1870’s there have been regular measurements of the strength of the magnetic field.

What do the studies show?

The findings show a consistent and continual decrease in the strength of the magnetic field. There are some bad ramifications for the continuation of life on Earth if that decay continues. The magnetic belt is the main shield of ultraviolet rays coming from the sun to the Earth. The magnetic field acts as a deflector of most of the ultraviolet rays that would hit the Earth if the field were not there.

If the magnetic shield were not there it would take only one major solar flare eruption that reached the Earth to wipe out all life on the Earth.

As we study the area of space travel we must consider allowing for protection of the ships and colonies which may be established on other planets or moons of planets. So far, Earth is the only planet which has a magnetic shield sufficient to protect living things from the deadly rays produced by the sun.

How this affects the theory of evolution

You have probably been taught from your childhood up that the Earth, the solar system and the galaxies are billions of years old. Secular humanist scientists say that life arose on Earth around 4 billion years ago. We hear the word billion and even trillion so much these days that we are seldom phased by it. Let’s build a trillion.

  • Let’s start with 10
  • 10 x 100= 1000
  • 1000 x 1000= 1,000,000(one million)
  • 1000 x 1,000,000 = 1,000,000,000(one billion)
  • 14 x 1,000,000,000 = 14 billion, which secular scientists say the age of the universe is.

Considering that the normal average age of a human being in the 21st century is around 70 years, there is really no way that we can comprehend such a time span. Do you think that this may be one reason that secular scientists want to use such incomprehensible numbers?  If you can not conceive it, just trust the scientist. Surely, he will tell the truth.

By leading us into the land of non-comprehension the scientist can now lead us wherever he may wish. This path is usually down the path of The Big Bang and life evolving from non-living matter. It is on this path that he will spin such wonderful “fairy tales” of how matter came into existence and how magically the elements by blind chance combined at just the right ratios at just the right time at just the right conditions to bring about a living cell. The cell was so robust that it was able to survive a totally hostile environment to a point that it was able to reproduce itself. It continued the process and grew more complex with each following generation.

What a compelling story!

Earth life

The fairy tale of life on Earth relies very much on the electro magnetic field that shields the Earth. That is one of the conditions that had to be just right. Not enough shield and the ultraviolet rays end life before it begins. Too much shield and not enough of the energy producing rays get through to provide energy for the food for the cell. Though this is just one of about twenty things that must be set to within a narrow percentage, it is totally necessary.

What has been discovered over the past 150 years is that the magnetic shield is decreasing. The secular millions and billions of years scientists are saying that the magnetic field is in the process of reversing its polarity. They blithely step over the fact that if anything like that ever happened that every living thing would be killed. Why?  Because there would be absolutely no protection from the destructive ultraviolet waves emitted by the sun. Evolution would have to start all over again. Believe it or not, some, so-called scientists actually believe that this has happened before. By so believing they complicate the fairy tale of evolution even more.

Another perspective

If we were to use the evolutionist’s tool of uniformitarianism and walk the decrease in magnetic strength backward, we would find that in just a matter of 20,000 years its strength would be such that atoms could not be combined to form elements and there would be no possible way for life to even come about. So, if that is true, and it is more logical than the fairy tales of the secular scientist, then the Earth probably is no more than 6,000 to 8,000 years old.

It seems that real science has once again pulled the mask off of the pseudo-scientists of evolution and the big bang.

What does science tell us?

Science does not itself tell us anything. Science is a concept built by human beings who use it to support the living things of the Earth. If science does not tell us anything, then what is its purpose? Science actually means knowledge, or the search for knowledge. So, why do we search for knowledge?

We search for knowledge because we are created to seek for it. The evolutionist does not believe that this universe and all that is in it was created. He believes it is all one big accident and everything in it has come about by chance. As one writer puts it, “Stuff happens”. Why does he believe this? He believes it because he is in rebellion against the Creator. How do we know this? There is a history book called The Bible, which has recorded the events that put all mankind and all creation toward rebellion and destruction. Ever since that event, the nature of all humans is to rebel against The Creator. So, many secular scientists refuse to acknowledge The Creator and therefore must fabricate some other means by which we see the universe we inhabit. Because they are in rebellion they will not seek the true knowledge and therefore they must make up their fairy tales.

Those who by grace and faith receive the truth of the Creator understand that in the beginning, in a perfect world, the Creator said, “Be fruitful and multiply, fill the Earth and subdue it; have dominion over it.” The King James rendering does not come across today as it did when translated, but God commanded man to learn of this beautiful and wondrous creation and to make it even more so.

True scientists will learn through the eyes of the Creator. That is why we want to learn.

Earth’s magnetic field

Though it is only one aspect of life on Earth, it is necessary. Follow after your Creator and learn about it and all life.

God bless you on your wonderful adventure.

 

Read more articles about wisdom HEREHERE,  and HERE.

 

 

What Is Wrong With Not Knowing-Science Today

I was watching a documentary on TV just lately and was a little taken back when I heard one of the “scientists” use a phrase which I had never heard equated with the study of science. He was a professor of anthropology and paleontology and was involved in the unveiling of a “new” lineage in the evolution of human being, that is homo sapiens. The statement with like this: “There is nothing wrong with not knowing in science.”

Science

The very definition of science is “knowledge”. How can a person who is supposedly a PhD in any field of science turn the definition on its head. My question to him, or her, would be, that if the definition of science is knowledge, how can you say that lack of knowledge is not a shortcoming? Yes, I can agree that the search for knowledge implies that there is more knowledge to be gained, but that does not justify that lack of knowledge is good. Is not knowing something a scientific concept?

The search for knowledge is always good. However, we must be aware that everyone who is seeking knowledge must make some “a priori” assumptions. Those assumed foundations, or axioms, will determine to a great degree how one will interpret the facts that we find.

Why not knowing was alright with the paleontologist

The reason for this “scientist’s” statement was that the fossil and bones that they found had upset 150 years of what paleontologists and anthropologists had believed about the evolution of homo sapiens. Rather than admitting that they had been wrong for 150 years and had presented as truth in many thousands of school and college text books, they glossed their big lie over by saying that there is nothing wrong with not knowing.

Would it not have been truthful and more scientific in the first place to admit that they really did not know and then present several possibilities that might fit the findings? That would have been the scientific thing to do and then allow studious and knowledgeable people to pursue avenues of further study.

But, no, they plunged headlong into making up stories about fossils that they said were 2 million years old. They literally made up stories of what they imagined happened and presented it as if it were true. The fact was that the same scenario could have come about by any number of ways. But, when it is your story, you can make up anything you wish. A real scientist would present as many feasible possibilities and then apply Ocham’s Razor.(The least complicated explanation is usually the correct one).

 

How long are they right

The content of the documentary was collected several years ago. In the time since the discoveries were made and documented, the findings and conclusions that were drawn have been shown to be incorrect or false. So, once again we are having to adjust what the text books are saying. This is becoming a common occurrence in every field of science that relates to evolution.

Scientifically it is understood that DNA cannot last more than a few thousand years. This has been proven by many observable scientific empirical experiments. However, when DNA was discovered in supposedly 70 to 100 million year old pliable flesh, the evolutionists changed the fact that it could not last except for a few thousand years to more than a hundred million years. Did they do it through experimental and logical science? No, they did not. If they were to admit that DNA could not remain intact but for a few thousand years, they would necessarily have to abandon the whole theory of evolution.

Rather than letting the facts dictate the conclusion, they chose to let their prior assumption redefine the science.

Not knowing

So the story continues. What do they not know. They say they know that chimpanzees and homo sapiens came from a common ancestor. But they do not know who or what the common ancestor was but that that ancestor came from apes.

Now, I ask, how can you know for sure that an unknown species came from and ape and that that unknown species somehow evolved several more times until there were two more identifiable species of homo sapiens and chimpanzees? How can you know anything about them if you do not know who they are along the process? That, then becomes a “fairy tale” to rival Peter Pan and The Lion King. These scientists could be writers for Walt Disney.

What are we being taught?

It is a sad thing to admit, but this is so common in so many sciences today. There are more and more so-called sciences such as sociology and psychology which are being shown to be nothing akin to true science. Many of these sciences are merely inventions to prop up a political agenda which by itself would have been seen as the foolish thing it is. But by adding an air of scientific viability to it it takes on respectability.

It is important today that when you read about science and scientific findings that you be aware of the source of its promotion. A prime example is the so-called “climate change” being pushed by politicians the world over. What is their goal. It surely is not for the good of those they say they are serving. Some leaders and promoters of climate change advocate the annihilation of up to 90% of human population. You will not hear them say it out loud, but that is a part of their agenda.

Now, evolution’s goal is a little different. Its goal is to separate human beings from their Creator. Evolutionists want you to think that you are nothing more that “goo”. They are in league with the great deceiver who was the first to rebel against the Creator. He has blinded the eyes of those who do not wish to acknowledge the Creator so that he can lead them to rebel against Him so that they will spend eternity in hell apart from their Creator.

Final analysis

You can choose to believe “scientists” who when confronted with their lies choose to glory in what they do not know and thereby continue to present their lies and lead people astray from the truths of science and from the truths of life.

Or you can choose to seek the truth with an open and curious logical mind. Then when it is revealed, you can believe it and build upon the truth. The beginning of truth for all creation is found in the Bible. If you begin with the truth of the Bible and build upon that foundation you will discover truths that will not have to be adjusted or changed with every new discovery that is made.

May you use your God given logic and understanding as you seek the truth.

To get a free Bible download click the button below.

FREE BIBLE DOWNLOAD

 

Why Do People Believe Evolution-Can Christians Believe Evolution

Even though most Americans do not believe in evolution the scientific establishment is dumbfounded as to why people do not believe in evolution. It is a wonder that there are so many who do not believe the Darwinian evolutionary scheme that they have been fed from before beginning their public school careers.

I would like to approach it from the other direction.

Why do people believe evolution?

I believe the question stated above is far more a logical approach to the question of evolution. If you were to take a survey of American citizens who have grown up in the public school system a good many of them would say that they believe in evolution. Even many church going people believe in the concept of evolution. Why is that so? If you were to survey the scientific text books used to teach in our public schools you will find that there is only one paradigm for the presence of life on earth. And that is evolution, and all the trappings that go with it.

If you had grown up in a remote location where there was no interaction with any other society or peoples and you were taught that your village or town was all that there was and that there was no way to leave it or venture out from it. You were never allowed to read anything that suggested that there might be other locations and peoples apart from your location and society. If that is all that you were taught from birth until you were 20 years old, what is the likelihood that that is what you would teach your children?

That is what has happened in the public school systems of the United States. One would think that 90% of US citizens would believe in evolution. Most of our college graduates do believe in evolution, though they are so lacking communicative skills that they can not tell you why. Quite often their reason is that evolution was all that they were taught. It is as if they grew up in a remote location and were never taught anything else.

Why do you believe evolution(if you do)?

I must admit that even when I was growing up that evolution was the paradigm that was taught. Though it was not as overt then as it is now. Professors and teachers speak of evolution as if it is a scientific law. Nothing could be further from the truth. If you were to ask them why, there answer would probably be something like, “My biology professor said so,” or “We see it all around us”” or “evolution is change and we se e change in all life.” All of these, and many more, are good non-scientific answers.

If you were to ask your college professor to give you three scientifically sound examples of Darwinian evolution, how many do you think he or she might present. The keywords are “scientifically” and “Darwinian”. You see, Darwinian evolution says that a life form must increase in complexity if it is to evolve. Science says that you must produce empirical evidence to prove a hypothesis. That has never been done in the field of evolution.

So, if you believe in evolution it is not because you have been convinced by the evidence, because there is no evidence. If you believe in evolution it is simply because you have been brainwashed and have never even considered an alternative. Public schools and colleges and universities have programmed their students to accept what ever they are taught is to be believed and not questioned. A true education system would teach its students to have inquiring and questioning minds. They would want the things they are taught to be logical and reasonable and applicable in their lives and society.

Dare to question evolution. Look at alternatives and see if they are logical and are grounded on scientific laws and principals.

Can Christians believe evolution?

This is almost an oxymoron. There are some people who say they are Christians and that they believe in evolution. Let me tell you why I do not believe that a Christian can believe in evolution(Darwinian evolution).

For the Christian, the foundation of his or her faith is the Word of God, The Bible. The only way to find faith by which one can receive salvation and become a “Christian” is to believe the Word of God. We know from the Bible that “By grace we are saved through faith.” We also know that the “faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God”. If someone decides that they will pick and choose which words to believe and which are not to be believed, then they have decided right there that word is not the Word of God. If you will take the time to read and learn about the Bible you will know that the first temptation to the first man and woman was that what God said was not really the whole truth.

When you decide that God did not mean what He said or what He had written in relation to how He created all things, then you have fallen for the original sin. Now, we can repent of sin, turn from it and walk in fellowship and believing our Creator. But do not think that you can maintain fellowship with your Creator after calling Him a liar. Look what happened to Adam and Eve and all of their descendants, whose we are.

If you want to believe in evolution, you are free to do so. But, do not call yourself a believer in God and His only-begotten Son, Jesus.

The answer, “No, you can not be a Christian and believe in evolution.

How do we know evolution is not scientific

We can know with confidence that evolution is not scientific. “How?”, you ask. First of all, to believe in evolution you must cast aside several scientific laws and findings which have been established and stood the test of time.

Evolution stands against the laws of thermodynamics. If we are to believe evolution we must cast these laws aside.

Evolution stands against the law of bio-genesis. Life only comes from life. That has been established since Pasteur.

Evolution stands against the law of cause and effect. An effect can not be greater than its cause. In fact, the cause is ALWAYS greater than the effect.

Evolution stands against the laws of probability.

Evolution stands against every finding with regard to DNA research. There is never an increase in information in DNA from one generation to the next, no matter how many mutations there are.

Conclusion

There is no scientific evidence for evolution. We have sought to present a few reasons why people might believe in evolution. None of them pass the test of logic or reason. If you believe in evolution you have every right to believe it. But, do not call yourself an intellectual person. Intelligence will cause you to pursue logic and truth rather than blindly following what someone force feeds you.

Your Creator instilled in you a spirit that seeks out truth. Truth is always logical and reasonable. But if you have been blinded by your education and other people’s belief, you may be truly blind to what is true.

I pray that you will use your God given mind and intellect to seek your Creator and the wonderful things He has in store for you.

 

 

 

 

How to Lose Weight Fast and Effectively – It Can Be Done

Causes of weight gain

In our fast paced society it is easy to stray from a nutritional diet with the result being overweight or even obesity. Either one of these tend to lead to health conditions which range from making one uncomfortable  to being life threatening with a plethora of maladies too numerous to list here.

Effects on society

Every day the effects of an over weight or obese society is chronicled in the news and medical journals. The most pronounced effect of obesity is in the area of heart disease. Though heart disease is the headliner, it is not the only one. Diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and many more conditions are brought about by being overweight.

It even affects manufacturing production. Depending on the job, over weight people do not produce and perform as well as fit and healthy people. Because of such conditions as these and many others, many are searching for ways how to lose weight fast and effectively.

Best way to lose weight

Of course there are ways to lose weight fast. But one must consider and ask if it is a healthy way as well.

Before beginning any weight loss regimen one should consult his physician. Your physician will give you direction as to what kinds of approach would be best for you.

Fasting is a great way to lose weight fast. But the best way to do that is under the supervision of a medical expert. By fasting, I mean that you do not eat any food for a given period of time but have a goodly intake of water or a defined liquid. The time set aside should not be too short or too long. If you have never fasted, begin by trying to fast for five days. I have noticed that five days is the hardest to make it to. If you can make it to five days you can probably do more. If you can not make five days, that’s OK. Do what you can and build it up the next time. When you end your fast do not gorge yourself. Begin with small portions and gradually build to regular portions.

Of course, not everyone will choose to fast, and some should not. But if you do not choose to fast follow a few simple instructions.

    • Do not skip meals
    • Eat breakfast – high protein preferred
    • Drink plenty of water
    • Avoid sugary drinks
    • Eat foods high in fiber
    • Eat more unprocessed foods
    • Drink coffee or tea
    • Eat slowly, chew your food

Other options

Now, you may consider some of the options which are available that are marketed on TV and the internet and many other avenues. Some promise a certain amount of weight loss in a certain amount of time. Others guarantee a particular weight loss for a certain amount of money. Just about all of these work to some degree or another. Before embarking on one of these diets it would be wise to check our testimonials and feedback from other sources.

There are more and more coming our every day which have been tested and proven to bring about good weight loss while maintaining healthy equilibrium. These methods range from special foods to special drinks and combinations of both. Many are backed by good research. Do your research as well.

Include exercise

To go along with your diet, a good regimen of exercise will greatly enhance the process of loosing weight. The truth found in all weight gain is that we tend to reduce our physical activity as we grow older. We sit far too much. We ride escalators and elevators. We remote control almost everything. We eat fast food instead of cooking our own.

Exercise is great for losing weight. Most people who are overweight a little could probably lose that weight fast by just adding a twenty-minute walk three times a week to their regular routine.

This is not an exhaustive list of how to lose weight fast and effectively but it will give you some idea of how to begin the process. It will be worth your effort to lose the weight. You will have much more energy. You will sleep better. You will be more creative. You will more productive. You will find yourself enjoying life and living it to the fullest.

Be encouraged. YOU CAN DO IT!

 

 

Smooth
Lose Weight

 

PS:

I would like to give you an opportunity to browse a few other weight loss programs and at the same time give me a little practice.

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks for checking out these fine products.