Collapse of Evolution

It’s reign of tyranny is finally at an end. For a century and a half it has reigned supreme in the kingdom of science. Its’ foundation was made of styrofoam and rested on whipped cream. It looked and sounded great while it lasted, but the collapse of evolution was preordained because it was really a fairy tale made up by haters of truth and deniers of logic and truth.

Evidence supporting evolution

The evidence which supported evolution was at best superficial. At its’ worst it is lacking in logic and reasonable conclusions of evidence. The people who built the “kingdom of evolution” were people who wanted to escape the constraints of a society built on principles derived from a Biblical world view. To achieve that goal it was necessary to present a scenario of how the universe came into being without the need of a Creator. In other words, the storytellers of evolution were anti-theists. The term I used is not atheist, but anti-theists. An atheist would need to be all-knowing to be able to determine with certainty that there is no God. Any rational person can understand that there is no one on this earth that knows all information. Thus, there can be no true atheist.

On the other hand, an anti-theist is someone who is against(anti) God. They know there is a Creator but they are filled with hate toward their Creator. Rather than yielding to logic and knowledge, they rebel and built a kingdom of rebellion against the true Creator of all things.

A picture of nothing

The evidence supporting evolution has never been based on good science but has always been built on just so stories of how things came to be and how they evolved to become different and more complex. How do we know they are stories? One reason we know they are stories is because the “facts” (I use the term loosely) of evolution keep changing. If something is true, it does not continually change. Evolutionists will never admit that they were wrong but will admit only that they are surprised when the truth of a certain evolution story is contrary to their original story. When a hypothesis does not prove true, they merely say that it will take more studies and money to discover why.

The evidence supporting evolution is at best tenuous. But to be truthful, it is just a story based on a lie. Is there any wonder that the collapse of evolution is inevitable?

What about scientific evidence for evolution

Picture of science experiment
What does science say?

Yes! What about it? There is not one shred of scientific evidence that will support evolution as taught in schools today.

They will use a false definition by defining evolution as change. It is easy to see that change occurs everywhere and in everything. So, they preach that evolution must be true.

But, that is not the true definition of what they call evolution. What they define as Darwinian evolution begins with the simple and progresses to the complex. They will overlook laws of nature in the beginning and along the whole process to bring about their wanted conclusion. To be Darwinian evolution each succeeding generation must become more complex. This must continue for millions of generations and billions of years. If that really happened then evolutionists might have a case to argue in the court of science.

However, science has disproved any such process occurring in living things. Instead of information and complexity increasing from one generation to the next, the opposite is occurring. As more and more information is gained about the process science is finding that all life is actually de-evolving(decreasing in information and complexity) instead of evolving.

Evolution is blind irrational faith

Blind man
Blind faith

Evolutionists enjoy making fun of people who believe in a God Who created the universe and all that is in it. But, being realistic and using a reasoning mind, it is easy to see that it is the evolutionist who is the one that is irrational in his or her belief. As science continues to prove the case against evolution, those who believe in evolution will have to travel further and further from the realm of rationality. As we learn more about the science of living things we see that they are the ones who accept the “belief” of evolution without any real evidence to back up their faith in it. That is what should be called a religion. But it is a weak religion because its’ “beliefs” are not built on viable evidence.

Irrational foundations

Desert Sand
Shifting Foundations

Let me list just a few of the “foundations” which evolutionists are building their house on.

  • The Big Bang. There is no scientific evidence to confirm without a doubt that such an event ever occurred.
  • Expansion. Once again no scientific evidence to support such a claim. They must have it there or The Big Bang cannot be possible.
  • Dark Matter. This is a substance that has never been observed or detected. Yet, they claim that it makes up 96% of the matter of the universe.
  • Dark energy. Once again this has never been detected or observed, but it makes up 75% of the energy of the universe.
  • Life spontaneously generates. This has never been observed and directly violates the Law of Biogenesis.

More evidence

Evolutionists were confident that the fossil record would validate their hypothesis of the increase of complexity in living things. They have drawn charts to support their theory, but the evidence of the fossils in the layers do not bear out what they were expecting. Instead of proceeding in complexity from lower layers to higher layers, it is a mixture of simple with complex and often in the reverse of what evolutionists predicted. The Cambrian explosion blows the concept of evolution out of the water because of the sudden appearance of complex creatures along with some of “simpler” forms.

The truth of the matter

It is one thing to make a mistake and not come to the right conclusion. But, it is a totally different matter when the facts say one thing and the scientist reports something else. All evidences point to a recent creation of less than 10,000 years ago. When a theory must constantly be revised and even rewritten so it can be maintained, then we are no longer dealing with science.

The people who “push” evolution are not scientists. They are snake oil salesmen and they will lie and present falsehoods or do anything just so their “theory” can still be maintained. They are not seekers of truth, but are wolves in sheep’s clothing seeking to rule over anyone that they can delude with their lies. The facts prove that evolution is a lie. It is devoid of sound scientific evidence.

The bigger picture

Picture of earth from space
World View

Evolutionists are merely a part of a bigger picture which is seeking to manipulate and rule over as many people as possible. It is run by what is called “the god of this world”. The Bible calls him a “liar and the father of all lies”. So, when you here a scientist or a documentary that talks of millions of years and billions of years, stop and think. These people have believed a lie and are trying to get you to fall for the same lie. Use the brain that your Creator gave you and do a little research. If you are willing to be logical and balanced in your research you will find that those who preach evolution have no real truth to base their beliefs on. Because of that, they have no foundation for what they believe.

Is there evidence for evolution? You decide.

God bless you as you search!





Science Fact vs Science Fiction-Why Do Scientists Lie

Among the most influential people in today’s society are those who call themselves scientists. It does not matter what field you are in you can gain prestige just by adding “scientist” or a “PhD” in the description of what you do. But because so many have taken advantage of this there has been introduced a voluminous amount of material into the knowledge base in the area of science. Because so many have entered the field with an agenda to push rather than a search for truth we have the problem of science fact vs science fiction.

Science fact vs science fiction

As agendas have been introduced more and more into science research it is becoming harder and harder to distinguish science fact vs science fiction. Over the past 60 years many science fiction genre have been produced which have really increased the interest of the general public in science. We have seen this in science fiction novels, movies, television series, super and mutated characters and gaming devices.

Much of the science used in these productions is well-founded. But just as prevalent is science which has no grounding in empirical evidence what so ever. Someone once pointed out that in the 1960s series of Star Trek how all the doors opened automatically when someone approached. That was founded on radio and infrared studies that pointed to such possibilities. We are very accustomed today for doors in many commercial establishments to automatically open when we approach.

But in that same series they introduced warp drive. This was supposedly accomplished by “warping” space so that the distance between objects were decreased by bending space and time. According to the theory of relativity gravity warps space. But the degree of warp is not great enough to facilitate a noticeable decrease in the overall distance between two objects. To develop that amount of gravity would ,according to “black hole” theory, suck everything into the black hole that is created and nothing could ever escape.

So we see sound science and fictional science portrayed as equal. After a half century of such things as this, it is hard for the “layman” to tell what is science fact and what is science fiction.

Why do scientists lie

The question may be better stated as “Do scientists lie?” We have had almost two full generations of students who have been force-fed whatever science told them to believe. Those in charge of the education system in America had a predisposed agenda. That agenda was one based on humanistic materialism. That particular world view does not allow for anything other than naturalistic causes in nature.

By setting this standard, they did not outright lie, they just pointed the direction which science had to move. If any view espoused anything other than a naturalistic process for the beginning of the universe or the beginning of life on earth, it was automatically dismissed as unscientific.

Where the lie comes in is that fail to tell you that this particular stance is unscientific. For generations we have believed what the scientists have told us. And the very premises that they promote is not scientific.

Many of today’s scientists have grown up being told the lie of only naturalistic causes can be scientific. To these students, that is the truth, because that is all that they know. They have not been told the real truth. They have been told the “truth” that fit the agenda of the humanist. They teach a lie as truth because that is all that they know.

Science searching for truth

True science is the search for truth. In the search for truth in any area, real science will consider and weigh the facts from every view point. Experiments will be performed and hypothesis will be confirmed or falsified. Hypothesis will not be denied simply because they do not fit the given agenda. Questions will be gladly entertained and put to the test to see if the hypothesis is viable or not. Proposals are not thrown out just because they contradict the agenda. Search for real truth entertains questions.

The science agenda that we have been fed the past half century does not allow for questions. It discounts scientific experiments which contradict their premises that all things must be naturally caused or explained. True science searches for real truths. If it does not allow for questions, then it is not real science.

Science fact science fiction

Real science is based in fact. Science fiction is based in imagination. The two are not necessarily opposed to one another. However, one must not confuse one for the other.

Let’s consider a few examples.

  • Naturalistic science says that this universe came from nothing.(Of course they had to amend that by saying it came from a singularity). Real science abides by first law of thermodynamics which says that matter/energy can not be created, increased or decreased by natural causes. That the universe came from nothing is fiction. The law is science.
  • Law of cause and effect says that the cause is always greater than the effect. How can nothing be greater than something? That nothing is more powerful than all the power in the universe is fiction. The law is science.
  • Naturalistic science speaks of “dark matter”, “dark energy” and “black holes”. These are constructs made up to fill in the holes which the “Big Bang” science can not explain. There is no proof of “dark matter”, “dark energy”, or even “black holes”. Real science is empirical and testable. It does not need to make up imagined constructs to make it viable.
  • Naturalistic science claims that life originated from lifeless molecules and evolved to humans. Real science abides by the proven law of abiogenesis, life comes from life.
  • Naturalistic science says that mutations cause life forms to grow in complexity. Real science abides by the scientific findings which prove that mutations cause a decrease in complexity and information in the species, thereby trending toward extinction.
  • Naturalistic science allows for results which back their agenda. Real science follows the facts and the results that they prove.


Let me state here, that I am not against science fiction. But I am against fiction that is promoted as science. We have too many so-called scientists today who are not scientists, though they have attained degrees in what are called scientific fields, but they have sold out to fame and money and prestige instead of searching for the truth in what ever field they are in.

It is time for the common man to begin to ask questions about everything. We must inform ourselves and be skeptical, even of our own beliefs. If a belief we have cannot stand up to logic and reason, then we might need to reconsider our stance. Real truth does not mind questions. If it is truth, it will stand any test put to it.

Science fact-science fiction
Celebrity Scientist

Many of the “scientific truths” that have been hoisted upon the populace are not truths at all. They are imaginations and illusions which people with a hidden agenda have forced upon us proclaiming them to be truths when in reality they are fictions. Listen to your news and documentaries critically. When they make statements about evolution or dark matter or dark energy or even climate change, just say out loud, (if only to yourself), “Give me some facts to back up your proofs. Is there any proofs that contradict your proofs?”

Not all science is fiction. But there is so much that is fiction that as you learn the truth you will be amazed at how much you have been lied to by people who have called themselves scientists.

My hope

Science fact
Truth will win

My hope is that this will not turn you off of real science, but will rather turn you on to real science and alert you to the science fiction that has been promoted as real science.

I encourage you to read on both sides of the question when presented by scientific findings. When you hear about the “Big Bang” from celebrated scientists, go and search for opposing views. You can find plenty on the internet.

When you hear National Geographic Channel speak of evolution, go and find a site that espouses creation rather than evolution. Compare and see which best fits.

When you hear your professor blithely state that so-and-so evolved, with respect kindly ask if he could delineate how it evolved and from what it evolved.

Remember, real science invites questions. Any science that can not be questioned is probably not real science.


To read more you can click HERE HEREHERE,  and HERE.